David Flusser has an incredible amount of
research pertaining to the historical Jesus. In the forward of his book “Jesus”
and later version “The Sage From Galilee”, R. Steven Notley reminisces of Flusser’s
characteristics regarding his passion:
“As Israel’s foremost scholar on Jesus and nascent Christianity, he [Flusser] was often asked to give comment on ‘the Jewishness of Jesus’ or provide ‘the Jewish perspective.’ Few requests irritated him more. Flusser’s close attention to philology and textual analysis cut against the grain of New Testament scholarship’s penchant for ‘trendiness,’ in which Jesus is recreated in the mold of whichever psychological or political trend is in vogue. He reminded his students that his was not the study of ‘the Jewish Jesus’ but the Jesus of history. That Jesus was Jewish is a matter of historical record. His optimism that careful philological-historical research could produce fruitful results in the study of the historical Jesus will surprise some skeptics.”
The fact that Jesus is Jewish is not
a matter of some trend or whimsical “Jewish roots” phenomenon that could blow
over in a decade. Some Christians misunderstand that the study of Jesus is not a certain perspective
pertaining to Jesus, but is by nature a Jewish inquiry. The historical Jesus is Jewish; there are no other
alternatives. The Jesus of the Christian tradition is mostly a fabrication, a hoax and
distortion (when taken outside of his cultural, rabbinic, messianic, Davidic and first century constructs). This is not conjecture or opinion by some. Those who have trouble
with the “Jewishness” of Jesus, take issue with the core of who he is, and ultimately what or who he represents.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Ground-rules for comments:
1) Identify yourself by observing social decorum and use your real name.
2) Please stick to the subject of the post. Introducing extraneous issues makes it confusing for everyone.
3) Relevant queries, informed comments and disagreement are welcomed, but don't use this as a soap-box to vent your pet views or to simply to be obnoxious.
4) State your query concisely and make your comment with regard for other readers.
5) Be honorable and avoid insults and slurs, and focus on engagement with the issues and data. Comments with personal attacks or insults will not be tolerated. Refutation, declaring an error, all welcome and appropriate, but keep it polite and fair.